Not supporting optional chaining (?.) of ES6

Mmmm... I knew it was equivalent but I didn't interpret it correctly in that context. Thanks!

0 means 'false'

It's alr fixed by Volie (see comment above)

It's alr fixed by Volie (see comment above)

I suppose I didn't change. in public static void main(String[] args) I call method greedy(dice). Method looks this way: public static int greedy(int[] dice) (like in kata)

Are you changing the input to the function? That will lead to mystifying errors like this.

I solved this Kata. My IDEA says, that int [] dice=new int[]{1,1,1,3,1} leads to 1100. But here Ive got a mistake when testing (int[]{1,1,1,3,1} leads to 1350). Is it possible to prove to admins, tham my code is ok?

Read this, please: https://github.com/codewars/codewars.com/wiki/Troubleshooting-your-solution

I've solved it, but c++ compiler on my pc doesn't report any problems and i passed all tests successfully. However, when i upload my code into the website, i don't pass final 2 tests..Why?? (i rebuilt my code so that it had 1 function called narcissistic(int x))

Guys. I wrote and came up with a solution in 20 minutes. I accidentally closed the code and I can't remember the solution for the second day (((((((

good idea but at least for python it gets stuck in formating/typing issues very easily.
I would recommend at least putting some of it in the instructions so the coder knows whats comming.

Works!
I don't understand why ... but it will have to be.
Thank you!